Joined: Oct 28, 2004 Posts: 5382 Location: Hollyweird
Posted: Thu Sep 04, 2008 1:31 pm Post subject: Digg.com is Corrupt
I found this horrifying.
I get this newsletter for webmasters from Webpronews, and this is the most irritating thing I have seen in a long time.
Quote:
A top Digg user with a popular ratio of 34% has been getting paid well for promoting articles on Digg. His/her popularity has allowed numerous stories to reach the Digg Home Page, and when that happens he/she gets paid even more.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Editor's Note: It's hard to imagine this is limited to Digg or even to the social media umbrella. It's even harder to distinguish how this differs from other PR/marketing tactics like celebrity endorsement or message creation and dissemination. The ethics road is a virtual quagmire of journalistic idealism vs. economic realism; but no one is altering truth, just presenting a truth more prominently. There's a lot to talk about, so talk about it in the comments section.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Invesp scored an interview with this person (who wishes to remain anonymous; for the purpose of this article, let's call them "Digg Throat" http://www.invesp.com/blog/social-media/an-interview-with-digg-top-user.html), and provides quite an interesting look into the behind-the-scenes world of Digg marketing and social media marketing in general.
"I have worked for many popular blogs and I know most top users do," explains Digg Throat. "As of now I am involved with three blogs/companies that I regularly help with social media promotion, especially on Digg. To put it in short : my status and reach within the community allows me to help businesses leverage their opportunities by reaching a different crowd and a large crowd for that matter."
Convert visitors with Google Analytics - free
Digg Throat has been charging up to $700 per article for his/her promotion, and if a particular item reaches Digg's home page, he/she gets another $500. Now that's some easy money. Too bad it's frowned upon by Digg, and Digg users alike. However, paid promotion is just a fact of Digg. It's not a surprise, and users who have a real problem with it, will likely just find another site to read. Besides, is this really that much different than paying PR staff to push your message?
What is Digg to do though?
"Digg should strongly consider placing clearly labeled advertisements within the news stories," says TechCrunch's Michael Arrington. "Even as paid ads they’ll get a ton of traffic and Digg can charge accordingly. TechMeme, a tiny site in comparison, has done this successfully for some time. If Digg can’t stop its users from making a little money on the side, they may as well get in on the game."
Something like this could work for Digg. It could incorporate spots into ad campaigns with existing clients like YouTube allegedly does (http://www.alleyinsider.com/2008/9/youtube-payola-is-anyone-paying-for-views-) with its promoted videos. Digg users may not be too enthusiastic about such a scenario though.
Something tells me Digg is going to be doing some investigating. They ought to be able to at least narrow down the number of possible suspects for Digg Throat's identity. He/she may have wished to remain anonymous, but may have still given enough information away for Digg to figure out who they are. This may not do much to combat that problem of what some would refer to as "Digg Spam", but I'm sure they would like to at least get closer to the bottom of it.
Because DIGG, and sites like it, have gotten to be such a huge way of promoting articles, it's sickening. It's like how GOOGLE will take money to give you a higher page ranking, and now DIGG and "user generated" rankings are corrupt too. There's no way of legitimately promoting your site or articles by user votes without eventually having to shell out dough to compete with other people shelling out dough.
Joined: Oct 28, 2004 Posts: 5382 Location: Hollyweird
Posted: Wed Sep 10, 2008 6:31 pm Post subject:
Looks like sites like DIGG may be getting their cuome-uppence soon! (thanks to Amanda for this)
Quote:
Former Disney Vice Chairman Hired By Justice Department9 September 2008 10:34 AM, PDT | From Studio Briefing | See recent Studio Briefing news
The Justice Department has hired former Disney vice-chairman and chief counsel Sandy Litvack to head an investigation into possible antitrust violations by Google in its growing control of advertising on online searches. The government is likely to oppose a deal between Google and Yahoo! who together reportedly account for more than 80 percent of the ads generated by online searches. Litvack, who had vigorously opposed Michael Eisner's hiring of Michael Ovitz (and later famously remarked that he had walked behind Ovitz "with a shovel"), had been the Justice Department's antitrust chief under Jimmy Carter before joining Disney. The announcement of Litvack's appointment caused Google shares to dive 5.5 percent on the Nasdaq Monday.
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
